Full Program View

Program by Day

Day 1

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4



Program by Track

Keynote

Collaboration

Content Technologies

Health and Hospital

Localization & Translation

Life Sciences Marketing

Medical Devices

Pharmaceuticals

Pre-Conference Workshops

Post-Conference Workshops

Software Demonstrations

Structured Content

Activities


Full Program View


Program Titles

A Comparison of Three Visual Help Authoring Tools

A Practical Guide to Capturing, Organizing, and Securing Your Documents

Authoring Assistance

Being Smart About Global vs. Local During Clinical Trials

Bringing User Experience to Medical Devices

Centralized Translation Processes

Changes to Labeling Requirements for Pharmaceutical and Medical Equipment Professionals

Collaboration Via Reuse

Content Technologies Market

Creating and Serving Relevant Content

Creativity or Confusion Factor?

Developing a Collaborative Team

Developing a Unified Enterprise Content Model

Drowning in a Sea of Information… What’s Your Rescue Plan?

Ensuring Information Quality

Extending Your Reach with SMS (Text Messaging)

Get Cleaned Up

Globalization Issues with Medical Device Embedded Systems

Handling DITA Topics and Translation in a Regulated Industry

Health Information Portals

Healthcare and the Internet

How to Enforce Standards in Life Sciences Documentation

How to Maximize Content for a Global Audience

How To Select and Procure Content Technologies

Marketing in a Connected World

Migrating to Structured Authoring on Your Way To XML

Phase 2 - What’s Next for Life Sciences and Enterprise Content Management

Preparing Compliant eCTD Submissions

Reducing Multinational Product Launch Times and Localization Costs

SPL Beyond CDER

Structured Content Beyond the Label

The Best Global Medical and Pharmaceutical Web Sites (and Why)

Transforming Technology Transfer and Recipe Management

Unlocking Handwritten Information from Medical Records

Web 2.0 and Healthcare

What’s New in Collaboration Tools

Writing Reusable Content for Different Audiences

XML-Based Collaboration with Office 2007

Your Global Audience is Already Here

[Case Study] Physician, Know Thy User

[Workshop] Adobe Captivate

[Workshop] Analyzing Your Deliverables

[Workshop] Content Modeling for Life Sciences Content

[Workshop] Creating High Quality Content that Communicates Across Language Barriers

[Workshop] Do you Know Adobe Acrobat?

[Workshop] Games To Explain Human Capability and Limitations

[Workshop] Learning DITA From Concept to Implementation

[Workshop] Product Life Cycles in the Life Sciences Industry

[Workshop] Simplified Technical English

[Workshop] Structured Product Labeling Workshop

[Workshop] Writing Reusable Content

Session Details

Preparing Compliant eCTD Submissions

Speaker: Antoinette Azevedo
Time: 9:45 AM - 10:45 AM   Date: June 24
Track: Pharmaceuticals

Experience level: All levels
Room: B & O

Life sciences regulatory authorities in North America, Europe and Japan have been developing standards for drug and biologic registration submissions in electronic format for over ten years. The current version of the format—electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD)—has been the recommended format since 2005 and is on the way to becoming mandatory. This presentation will provide an overview of best practices to enable a sponsor to prepare a compliant eCTD for regulatory authority review.

A California biotech submitted an eCTD to the US FDA in summer 2005. This company used commercial-off-the-shelf publishing software, experienced consultants, and in-house staff to compile this eCTD. This drug was the biotechs first candidate for commercialization. The biotech was partnered with big Pharma to assist with sales and marketing after the FDA authorized the drug for marketing. The biotech hired a sales force of nearly 200 in anticipation of FDA approval.

The FDA issued a refuse-to-file on this eCTD in fall 2005, due to problems with the PDF files and navigability of the content of the submission. The company’s market capitalization dropped 50% overnight. The company had to recompile the submission, by reworking the source files and rebuilding the XML backbone. The new version of the eCTD was resubmitted in early 2006. The FDA accepted the resubmission for review. 

However, in May 2006 the FDA issued an approvable letter, that meant the drug could be approved in the future if certain conditions were met (meaning yet another delay in being able to market the product, plus additional expense to conduct further clinical studies). In June, 2006, the big pharma company terminated the partnership with the biotech. In July 2006, the biotech laid off their sales force. In August, 2006, the biotech laid off 100 more employees. In September 2006, the biotech had a meeting with FDA to discuss what additional studies and analysis was needed. Finally, in January 2007, the biotech announced plans to resubmit its NDA by end of second quarter 2007.

The impact to the company’s stock price over three years is shown in the chart below.

This presentation will describe:

  • Regulatory and business drivers behind the eCTD format
  • Technical components of an eCTD
  • Practical implications of collecting documents and data over the discovery, development, application review, and post-marketing lifecycle phases of a drug or biological product
  • Global picture for adoption of the eCTD format
  • Future direction for the eCTD format
  • Role of electronic document management in the eCTD lifecycle
  • Top 12 Issues FDA Has with eCTD and how to avoid them
  • Preparing submission-ready source documents and data for submission in eCTD
  • Whether to purchase an eCTD publishing system or to outsource.
  • How to prepare for the technical challenges of eCTD